4 of the best



There are good reasons why I normally do a blog post on Saturday nights - because if I don’t, it just doesn’t happen once the week gets underway. And this week is especially busy, with lots of reading, a submission, contractual stuff, and thinking towards (a.k.a. worrying about/prevaricating) the various upcoming speeches, on both continents, I’ve not yet started preparing. So a bit of midnight-oil is being burned most nights as the rain gently patters down outside the plantation shutters of the Greenhouse.

But I wanted to let you know that I’ve been reading some excellent books recently.  Have you?  Would you like to tell us about them? I’ve also read some that just haven’t really excited me, despite expectations (or the amount of money I know was paid for them!). It’s a very subjective thing, isn’t it - what you love and what you don’t. The extent to which agents and editors disagree with each other might also surprise you, because yes, we do sit down and chat quite passionately about books when we meet up.  As a publisher I was in many an editorial meeting where someone would be looking completely baffled as another person extolled the virtues of a particular manuscript. But this range of opinions is a good thing. Because if we all agreed it would lead to an incredibly narrow publishing scene with everyone fighting for exactly the same book and rejecting all the rest.  So hurrah for diversity, idiosyncracy, and that weird thing called ‘personal taste’!

Would you like to know which books have lit my fire recently?  Here are four:

Top of the list has to be THE HUNGER GAMES by Suzanne Collins.  Yes, yes, I know, you’ve all heard lots about this one and everybody’s going on about it. But there’s a reason why.  It’s fabulous! Every now and then I read a book that makes me think, ‘How come no one has come up with this idea before?’ Or even better: ‘Why didn’t I think of this?’ This is one of those. Set in a dystopic future when North America is in ruins, a new nation called Panem has emerged. At its centre is a shining Capitol surrounded by twelve outlying districts. Every year the Capitol exerts its power by choosing one boy and one girl from each district to participate in the annual Hunger Games, a fight to the death on live TV. When 16-year-old Katniss steps forward to take her little sister’s place, she knows she’s going to die. However, Katniss is a survivor and almost without meaning to she becomes a serious contender.  But to win she’s going to have to make terrible choices between survival, her humanity, and love.

Fantastic because:  It’s a great concept - strong, original, convincing, and oh so dark. It weaves moral issues with questions about the media and political power, while giving us a growing love story at its heart. Plus the writing is taut and pacy.  (Oh, it’s also pretty violent.)

Next I’m going to choose the very different AUDREY, WAIT! by Robin Benway. Again, it’s a ‘Why hasn’t anyone thought of this before?’ kind of book.  When Audrey decides to break up with her less-than-attentive boyfriend Evan, a wannabe rock star, she little dreams that he’s going to write a song about it.  A song that proves to be extraordinarily catchy. In fact, a song that blasts its way up the charts and launches Evan and his band to big-time success. But what happens when you’re the heroine (oh no, make that the villain) of the song, and everyone suddenly wants to know you and blame you for the break-up?  Now Audrey’s world famous - and suddenly fame doesn’t quite look all it’s cut out to be! (Please note: lots of ‘bad’ language here.)

Fantastic because:  It’s a great concept (again) - smart, funny, and instantly makes the reader wonder, ‘Suppose that was me?’ Plus the voice is fresh and genuinely funny, in a genre where you’d think it’s all been done before.

Third up is a book by one of my favourite, tip-top authors. It’s HERE LIES ARTHUR by Philip Reeve.  Yes, that’s the Philip Reeve of the awesome MORTAL ENGINES quartet, the last of which - A DARKLING PLAIN - won the Carnegie (Britain’s equivalent of the Newbery).  HLA is set around AD 500, when people in Britain spoke a language similar to Welsh and when the country was torn apart by feuding war-bands, including one led by a brutish soldier named Arthur.  When the bard Myrddin sees Gwyna’s swimming abilities, he rescues her and takes her in, immediately seeing a way he can ‘magically’ turn Arthur into not only the most powerful leader of his day, but also an awe-inspiring hero. But as Arthur’s power grows, Gwyna’s life becomes increasingly dangerous as she’s turned from a slave-girl into first a boy, then a goddess, and finally a spy. Can Gwyna survive these perilous times? Is Myrddin really on Gwyna’s side?  And is Arthur quite the hero that legend has made him out to be?

Fantastic because:  It’s a great concept (er, have you heard this before?) - but vintage Reeve in the skillful interweaving of historical erudition with a child’s-eye view of a virtually unknown period of history. Truly masterful, it gives a completely fresh insight on the age-old story of Arthur and how it might have come to be.  Plus (also vintage Reeve) every word is crafted, every word counts, and some sentences you just have to pause and reread.

And finally, I’m picking THIRTEEN REASONS WHY by Jay Asher, the bestselling teen novel that many of you may have read.  Clay gets home from school to find a strange box with his name on it.  Inside are some cassette tapes, recorded by Hannah Baker - the girl he once went out with - who committed suicide a few weeks before.  Hannah’s voice tells Clay that there are thirteen reasons why she ended her life, and Clay is one of them. Following Hannah’s voice he roams the town that night - and starts to understand Hannah’s pain and the truth about himself.  Truth he never wanted to face.

Fantastic because:  What a superb concept - tight, clever, and enabling the author to create an incredibly powerful story taking place over a short period of time for maximum intensity. This is a thriller, but with a real beating heart.  Plus the writing is effective and spare.

Four books for the month of September. Four books I really enjoyed and admired.  How about you?

Posted by on 10/01 at 06:43 PM

What happened to the other three books?

Posted by  on  10/01  at  07:42 PM

Here Lies Arthur - I have to agree it’s a wonderful story.  For me, mainly because I think he gave a great new twist to the Arthur legend.

The Hunger Games sounds very intriguing.  Another to add to my list.

I recently finished Un Lun Dun by China Mieville and I loved his vivid imagination and original ideas / inventions.  Could have been a bit snappier to read but the imagery - loved it.

I have a question if I may, Sarah? 
Book length - is this an issue we amateur writers should worry about or is it a case of let the story dictate the length.  My recent submission weighs in at a mighty 95,000 words, and I feel I edited ruthlessly, but I was warned that it would be too long. 
Yet I am reading books, albeit by established children’s authors, that are 400+ pages long. 
Thanks.

Posted by  on  10/02  at  08:42 AM

Sarah: Um, I’m not sure what you mean.  But presume you may have logged on as I was creating the post.  It may well be that as I interim ‘save’ (otherwise I get timed out!) the article may post. So you must have read it when half-finished (and 3 books still missing).  Sorry, but don’t know how to stop that! If a post doesn’t make sense, try logging in an hour later to see if it’s complete. They do take me a while to write.

Posted by Sarah Davies  on  10/02  at  12:12 PM

Tracy: I published UN LUN DUN, when at Macmillan, so it’s one I acquired! Small world.
Length:  Yes, your manuscript is a whopper! The printer exploded. wink I’m going to be annoying and not give you a proper answer because until I read it I don’t know if the length is justified.  I tend to feel let the story dictate the length rather than giving hard-and-fast rules. I think H. Potter blasted the rulebook out of the water. That said, I’ll be looking to see whether the length damages the pace or weakens the plotting. And if I want to finish it. If it turns out to win the Carnegie, no one will mind in the least about the length. smile

Posted by Sarah Davies  on  10/02  at  12:18 PM

THIRTEEN REASONS WHY has been on my ‘to read’ list for some time, so I have to get to it.

Recently I’ve enjoyed:
THE ADORATION OF JENNA FOX by Mary E. Pearson because the story centers around such a thought provoking and provocative topic. Plus, I thought she did an amazing job of building the character arc as the character’s memory slowly returned.

and
THE POSSIBILITIES OF SAINTHOOD BY Donna Freitas, which is simply one of the sweetest, funniest teen romances I’ve ever read.  The main character, Antonia Lucia Labella leaps off the page and I’m sure if I met her we’d be good friends.

Posted by  on  10/02  at  01:30 PM

My favorite Sep. read was The Eye, The Ear, and the Arm by Nancy Farmer. She’s fantastic.

Also read - Wicked Lovely, great concept, The Time Thief, by Linda Buckly-Archer, loved it, Breaking Dawn, after I got over the one issue, loved it, but wished it was shorter, Northlander by Meg Burden, loved it.  And read aloud to my little ones - Nurk, by Ursula Vernon was so cute, and they thought You’re a Bad Man Mr. Gum by Andy Stanton was hilarious.  And I love to hear them laugh.

Posted by  on  10/02  at  03:40 PM

The Aldous Lexicon Trilogy by Michael Lawrence, alternate realities, different versions of the same character, male and female all very clever and fun! Book of Lost Things by John Connolly, love the bleak but satisfying resolution. Artemis Fowl and the Time Paradox is currently being read by one of the children...me next! Oh and London by Edward Rutherford cos I do read thick books too sometimes.

Posted by Jon M  on  10/02  at  07:05 PM

I read the Hunger Games too and I completely agree- it was amazing!  I couldn’t read it fast enough.  I’ve also ordered Maggie Stiefvater’s Lament, which is a dark fairytale that sounds really hot! I’m not sure if it can be as good as it sounds but i’ve got my fingers crossed…

Posted by  on  10/03  at  11:46 PM

I’m with Sheila. Nancy Farmer is fantastic. THE HOUSE OF THE SCORPION is a personal favorite. I don’t usually go for science fiction because the characters so often take a back seat to the concept, but Farmer develops both with excellent results.

Posted by  on  10/04  at  01:52 PM

Sarah, yes I must have logged in when you were still posting the last of your three books, so when it cut off after No. 1, I panicked...sorry!

On another note, it seems I missed the deadline for signing up for the SCBWA chapter mtg on October 25. I had been looking forward to meeting you there, but alas… We’re practically neighbors anyway, so maybe I’ll run into you at the local Whole Foods. grin Do you ever attend the Bethesda Writer’s Center First Friday events in Leesburg?

On yet another note, I’ve noticed in the posts above some of the character’s names in your readers’ recommendations. Some are odd or otherwise don’t roll off the tongue. The main char in my current work has an unusual name and many are commenting that it’s too risky for a first-time YA author to get away with that. I chose my char’s name very deliberately and personally feel it would be a deal breaker if an agent/publisher wanted me to change it. Thoughts?

Posted by  on  10/07  at  01:43 PM

I’m sorry to miss you at the conference. We should rendezvous in the fresh-produce aisle for sure!
My brow furrows a bit at what you say.  There are 2 things here:
Firstly, no agent or publisher is going to turn down your work on the basis of an unusual name. That is a ‘micro’ thing; what we look at is the ‘macro’. Especially if you have a particular reason for using the name (though I can’t assess because I don’t know what that reason is).
Secondly, be very, very wary of saying ‘deal breaker’.  To turn down representation or publication over a name?  That concerns me because it makes me wonder what else you might consider a deal breaker.  Representation/publication requires a lot of negotiation, accommodation, discussion, and a writer really needs to trust their agent and editor’s market knowledge. I never like the term deal breaker, because my experience is that things work better if both sides can move towards consensus. Hope this helps.

Posted by Sarah Davies  on  10/08  at  02:06 PM

Just finished reading ‘Here Lies Arthur’ and wished I’d written it.

Posted by Jon M  on  10/08  at  05:46 PM

Okay, it’s a deal...no more “deal-breakers.” My reaction may have come across strongly because a couple of agents recently took issue with my char’s name, insisting that it must “roll over the tongue or it’s no good.” I thought that a bit strong on their part given that all they were going on was the name without having read any of the story. I didn’t have the opportunity to make my case due to the nature of the situation. I’m all for negotiating, accommodating, discussing.

Posted by  on  10/09  at  05:44 PM

THE KNIFE OF NEVER LETTING GO - Patrick Ness.

WOW.  FANTASTIC.  A MUST READ. 

I don’t want to say too much for fear of giving things away but this is the first book I’ve read where I’ve felt compelled to contact the writer and tell him how wonderful I think it is.

I cried buckets at one scene.  Isn’t it fantastic when a book involves you so much - makes you truly feel for the characters.

Posted by  on  10/20  at  11:45 AM

The concept for Hunger Games has been thought of before--it’s actually same plot as a Japanese movie called “Battle Royale”, which I would say is even more gripping (although slightly bloodier).

I thought the premise for Life as We Knew It was the most original one I had seen for an apocalypse book.

(By the love, I LOVED the Mortal Engines series). Philip Reeve is a national treasure)

Posted by Siobhan  on  10/31  at  04:09 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL: